sounds so insistent and at various levels a chilling suspicion: Alan García lobby for pardon or release from prison of former dictator Alberto Fujimori and his advisor Vladimiro Montesinos? Many will read with skepticism
this concern, but would do well to think a little more, because somehow try to collect what was behind a Machiavellian plot that is woven from the Government Palace.
is fatal to Alan García Ollanta Humala wins the election. It is already clear that they are going to investigate seriously and will not have to Attorney Echaíz to miss him the Petroaudios USB. Therefore
Debno at all costs prevent the victory of populist candidate Ollanta Humala, to do the horse Trojan could be Alberto Fujimori.
You think this is political suicide? Not really. The political survival of Alan Garcia is a function of impunity for crimes committed during his rule, and is well known that has 70% disapproval, so it does not matter perpetrating unpopular.
is true that the release of former dictator and his adviser are strong words, but would yield fruits Alan García why? Simple.
free
If nobody can reproach KEIKO FUJIMORI she released her father. And in 5 years everything is forgotten, especially after many grassroots party that will make the dictator remember that 20% of the Fujimontesinismo core is impervious to all reason or evidence against their leader.
If Keiko win, then you should a very large, and we all know that among mobsters one hand washes the other. 
If you win (as Alan Garcia feared) the populist candidate Ollanta Humala, have Alberto Fujimori and Montesinos loose on the street would be a huge factor of disturbance democratic, and certainly among the two would have to check the new government. Sufficient to prevent operation for the souls of the marginalized people begin to get impatient. is clear then that the Machiavellian imagination of Alan García, the plan for Siamese twins free of corruption is underway. A minor problem is the consistent international jurisprudence that welcomed the pardon for crimes against humanity. Caballazo But everything can be done, and if someone wants to fix things would have to wait until July 2011 (if they let you try to fix things). Much eye then, Alan Garcia is desperate and thinks its most dangerous card out of his sleeve.
Source: Masks
http://www.caretas.com.pe/Main.asp?T=3082&S=&id=12&idE=926&idSTo=0&idA=51945
Parole legal guidelines on pardons to Alberto Fujimori.
of becoming President of the Republic, "Keiko Fujimori may pardon his father, sentenced to 25 years in prison for crimes against humanity?
Diego Garcia-Sayan, head of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights, argued that "with specific regard to pardons for human rights violations or crimes against humanity is clear that any discussion or decision on this issue must be well founded in law. " 
Some legal considerations on the subject of a pardon indicate the following: 1 .-
power to grant pardons is the President of the Republic. But like any award, it must be exercised in accordance with the law. 
Some legal considerations on the subject of a pardon indicate the following: 1 .- 2 .- It is under discussion in international law can not apply for amnesty or prescription benefit when it comes to serious human rights violations. This principle has just been ratified by the Constitutional Court (TC) when it declared unconstitutional, on 21 March, essential aspects of the Legislative Decree 1097 of September 2010. The meaning of the TC's decision is clear: the mandate is to pursue and punish crimes against humanity.
3 .- What about the pardons? In this case the facts have already been investigated and justice established criminal liability. Fujimori sentenced to 25 years by the Supreme Court for murdering 25 people, the aggravated kidnapping of two others and the occurrence of various aggravating circumstances (treachery, among others). The Supreme Court in its ruling of December 2009 described the act as "crimes against humanity" (paragraphs 1.2.1 and 1.2.2).
4 .- The most active American courts tend to establish that these grave violations against pardons do not fit. The Supreme Court of Argentina has given the inapplicability of international crimes against pardons (Case Santiago Omar Riveros, 2007), it would clash with the international obligation to apply sanctions commensurate with the gravity of the crimes.
5 .- The TC has been argued in such a sense in the March 2011 ruling by emphasizing the principle of "proportionality": the greater the violation, the greater should be the degree of satisfaction of another, hence the requirement State sanction.
6 .- In any case, the presidential power could not ignore the law 28760 expressly provides that the application for clemency in the case of kidnapping. This approach, moreover, is the same in other countries in the region and Colombia, for example (specifically prohibited amnesties and pardons for members of terrorist offenses, kidnapping and extortion).
7 .- What about the "humanitarian pardon? Existing regulations limit you to three situations: a) terminal illness; b) non-terminal illness for which prison conditions "can be placed at serious risk", and c) those affected by mental illness for which prison conditions can also put in "grave risk." Either option would have to be properly and solidly grounded. Not appear that, in this case, one of three applicable, since there seems to be a "disease terminal "deplorable conditions nor the Diroes, which a pardon would not proceed.
CARETAS Garcia Sayan told that by his current position, it is difficult to comment on this issue, but called for "actions of the authorities in such matters are within the international law, which is part Peru by sovereign decision ", as well as existing standards into domestic law."
0 comments:
Post a Comment