Both are right, and can say that both embody the best and the worst of it. MARIO VARGAS LLOSA While defending its principles, despite what many fans del sector AB puedan decir, PPK es el eterno lobbyista que ha vivido de los grandes negocios con el Estado peruano, desde la época de los negocios aún no esclarecidos con la IPC en el primer gobierno de Fernando Belaúnde, hasta los extraños manejos que realizó con SUSANA DE LA PUENTE respecto al Banco Wiese, o la negociación del gas de Camisea.
Mientras MARIO VARGAS LLOSA es el típico liberal: confrontacional, polémico pero honesto en sus convicciones. PPK es el mercenario del billete, uno de los tantos mercantilistas descritos por Hernando de Soto en su libro "El otro Sendero".
Por eso no sorprenden estas "Vidas Paralelas" que Plutarco podría describirlas con más entusiasmo e inspiration.
Today, Mario Vargas Llosa, overcoming political differences with Humala gives a lesson in objectivity and intellectual honesty. PPK instead returns to his own, or rather what he did during the campaign: to Lobbying and clowning. While
PPK fails in its attempt to bring treacherous daughter of the dictator to the Government Palace, the former first lady suffered two serious setbacks: Carlos Raffo, his publicist and strategist leading away from your organization while Hurtado Miller fell in the hands of justice.
Consider the contrasts between MVLL and PPK:
FACEBOOK DE ALEJANDRO TOLEDO: Today I received in my office Kuczynski. Came not only to propose a 6-point agreement. He took a step further suggested support Keiko Fujimori. Pedro Pablo does not know me. 
http://www.voanews.com/spanish/news/latin-america/vargas-llosa-jamas-votaria-fujimori-keiko-peru-119772984.html Nobel Prize for Literature Peruvian Mario Vargas Llosa said that in certain circumstances vote for the nationalist Ollanta Humala in Peru's presidential runoff, but that would never change by Keiko Fujimori.
"For Humala want to see what will happen, what exactly the conditions under which it will establish partnerships. Let's see. Time will tell and when the case then explain the reasons why would take this decision, "Vargas Llosa said in an interview with National Television of Chile (TVN) during his visit to the country.
Vargas Llosa was defeated by Alberto Fujimori in the 1990 presidential elections in Peru. Now, twenty years after , said "never" vote for his daughter, Keiko Fujimori.
voting for Keiko Fujimori,
"Peruvians claim one of the most heinous dictatorships that we have, whose leaders are also in prison, serving sentences of 25 years , starting with Fujimori for crimes they committed horrendous and frightening robberies, "said
writer.
"I would not vote for it again", said Vargas Llosa, who received the degree of 'Doctor Honoris Causa' at the private University Andres Bello in Chile.
In previous statements to the newspaper La Vanguardia, Vargas Llosa cited that Humala is "Chavez abrasileñado language, the catastrophe", while "
with Keiko, criminals and murderers would spend in jail the government." The writer likened
electoral choices like choosing between AIDS and terminal cancer.
The leftist candidate Ollanta Humala will face on June 5 to the right-wing congresswoman Keiko Fujimori.
0 comments:
Post a Comment