vote for Ollanta Humala. Psychosocial 21 is discredited
has put the record straight. And unambiguously expressed to vote for Ollanta Humala. Has been discredited psychosocial newspaper Peru 21 claiming that the writer took Earn candidate distances Peru. Wednesday, April 20, 2011
Mysore Malege Blue Film
The reason for the virulent campaign of Peru 21, which seems increasingly a supplement to the newspaper La Razon, EXPRESS MAIL and could be due to the past of its director Fritz Dubois, who was conspicuous contributor Alfredo Jaililie in the Ministry of fujimorato and economy during the time Keiko was First Lady.
A shame. We enclose the
psychosocial Peru 21 and the resounding denial from Nobel Prize in Literature, Mario Vargas Llosa.
http://peru21.pe/noticia/745311/vargas-llosa-toma-distancia-humala
17:51
News Kirchner in Argentina, with which the leader of Ghana stressed Peru matches and shown sympathy.
"The policies implemented do not seem the ideal for either Argentina or for any country", said in an interview with the newspaper Clarín, which also indicated that "the failed policies and to persevere in error" led to this country to have "unexpected problems."
"The case of Argentina is very tragic. When three-quarters of Europe penaban to survive, Argentina was developed. There was almost no illiteracy, there were institutions, democratic thinkers, liberals. That should have been allowed to build a country like Switzerland, "he said.
also deplored the censorship that has received from a group of Argentine intellectuals about their presence at a conference in Buenos Aires will offer next Thursday.
http://www.larepublica.com.pe/20-04-2011/vargas-llosa-anuncia-que-votara-por-ollanta-humala-0
Vargas Llosa announces he will vote for Ollanta Humala
The Nobel Prize in Literature, Mario Vargas Llosa spoke at a meeting in Buenos Aires with a sign in his hands. In his speech at the meeting organized by the Mont Pelerin Society, the writer said they would vote for Ollanta Humala in a runoff election. Belén Delgado
"Without joy, with many fears, I'll vote for Ollanta Humala and I will ask the Peruvian democratic to do the same to me. My hope is that what the candidate Humala says now is true. He says he has to Chavez as a model but to Lula.
rejura Jura and not nationalize the companies, who will not touch the media, who just wants to increase social assistance programs, tax increases, especially mining, such as windfall, and that in all other waiver; for example in all actions that cause mistrust, is this true? If it is a tactic to win the votes of the middle class that Humala need to win the presidency, it is impossible to know, "the writer argued.
Lamula.pe As reported by the portal, who attended the gala, the Peruvian Nobel said: "My hope is that most Peruvians support the nomination democratic demanding evidence of that democratization. If not, tomorrow will face a risk of a dictatorship, as we have addressed to Fujimori, but at least I think that the principle of legality will be maintained. We made too many mistakes and I hope that these errors serve to reflect and not to make them again. " The writer explained
that in the present circumstances, the "greater evil" is the return to power of the dictatorship of Alberto Fujimori, embodied in the figure of his daughter Keiko.
According to witnesses, the Nobel Prize for Literature was accompanied by Patricia and Alvaro Vargas Llosa and Susan Abad, Pedro Cateriano, Enrique Ghersi, Federico Salazar and Juan José Garrido, among others.
The news surprised many participants present at the ceremony held at a hotel in Argentina's capital and ended the doubt that existed about the writer's final decision, after a few days ago declared that would vote for Ollanta Humala but never by Keiko Fujimori.
hypothesis raised by Vargas Llosa became reality. In his speech, recalled some of the ills that led to the government of Alberto Fujimori in the 90's as, for example, estimated the theft of $ 6,000 million, crimes against humanity, torture and disappearances that occurred during those years.
The author of "The City and the Dogs" took the opportunity to draw attention to the democratic forces that were out of the race. According to Vargas Llosa
, other candidates were devoted to "shatter each other" and acted with "blindness and selfishness," which ultimately meant to enforce Humala and Fujimori and "leave a country that is on wheels over the edge." Vargas Llosa did not dare to predict the outcome. Key
VS. Mario Vargas Llosa attended the 1990 presidential elections, in which he lost in the second round to Alberto Fujimori himself. Then, has strongly criticized the government of former president, was sentenced to 25 years in prison for human rights violations.
Democratic. Vargas Llosa said they would vote for Alejandro Toledo in the first round to defend democracy.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 comments:
Post a Comment